Evidence in Chinese patent enforcement: Key differences with the US

Logo
Presented by

MIP

About this talk

Join Ude Lu, the chief IP counsel (US) of Purplevine IP, Helen Zhang, the litigation manager of Purplevine IP in Beijing, and Penny Sun, the brand protection manager of ABRO Industry, as they discuss evidence collection for patent enforcement in China and the US virtually with Managing IP on November 9 at 10am (US ET) / 3pm (UK) / 11pm (China). China has become one of the most litigious countries for patent enforcement. Foreign patentees may therefore face challenges when collecting evidence in China because, unlike in most European countries and the US, the plaintiff has the burden of proof in proving infringements. Foreign patentees should have well-planned patent enforcement strategies and be prepared for evidence collection when encountering lawsuits in China. The webinar will focus on the differences between the Chinese and US approaches to infringement litigation in the following areas: • The types of evidence required; • The factual evidence needed; and • Evidence regarding the claim amount. Join Purplevine IP’s experts as they compare evidence collection for patent litigation in China with the approach in the US.
Related topics:

More from this channel

Upcoming talks (0)
On-demand talks (23)
Subscribers (11631)
‘What keeps in-house counsel awake at night?’ is one way to summarise our editorial focus. We aim to track the strategies of in-house IP counsel within
companies, big and small, by speaking directly to them about the day-to-day issues they face. Law firms need practical information that they can apply when
advising their clients, and companies find value in benchmarking their strategies with those of their peers. This is why we have adopted this approach in our
subscription-based service. Our content is not reactionary or news-focused, but informed and actionable. In this pursuit of in-house intelligence, we also pu…